I know the engine is new and all that, but let's do a comparison:įrom the previous Halo games, the following is missing: If we look at the game tech-wise, it is a big downgradefrom previous Halo games. So why is it that Halo4 gets all this praise from those same people? The conclusion is often that the graphics are only great because of the art, and not because of the technical skill of the developer. In the case of many technical masterpieces (from competing platforms I might add), it is often said that the technology of those is "nothing special", it has "often been done before", and so on. While I do believe the game's aesthetic is a big step up from previous Halo titles, I fail to see how any of this is a technical accomplishment, if at all. ![]() ![]() ![]() I was reading a lot of hyperbole in the Halo 4 thread.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |